← All work

research - Quantitative Research

Media Framing & Content-Representation Study

Does consumer sentiment change which kinds of movies succeed? Six ways of representing a plot, tested on 5,388 films.

Role
Researcher
Team / Org
Course study (INST664)
Timeline
Jan – May 2026
Skills / Tools
  • Text representation
  • Interaction modeling
  • FDR correction
  • Box-office analysis

Overview

A completed INST664 study asking whether consumer sentiment changes which kinds of movies succeed. I compared six ways of representing film plot summaries (genre labels, LDA topics, SBERT embeddings with PCA and K-means, lexicon affect, and theory-driven semantic axes) and modeled within-year box-office percentile against content-by-sentiment interactions on 5,388 films (1978–2012), with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction within each method. There was no aggregate sentiment effect, but there were real content-conditional shifts, written up as a full paper.

What I did

  • Compared six plot representations: genre labels, LDA topics, SBERT embeddings with PCA and K-means, lexicon affect, and theory-driven semantic axes.

  • Modeled box-office percentile against content-by-sentiment interactions on 5,388 films (1978–2012), with a TMDb-augmented 6,961-film sensitivity check.

  • No aggregate sentiment effect, but real content-conditional shifts: teen-setting stories gained relative advantage in higher-sentiment periods (q = 0.02).